Bheed Collection: Rajkumar Rao flopped at the box office, because of this the film did not get the ‘crowd’ of the audience

news2news

Bheed Collection: Rajkumar Rao flopped at the box office, because of this the film did not get the ‘crowd’ of the audience

图像查看器免费摄影图.

图像查看器免费摄影图.

Bheed Movie Collection: Once again the phase of failure has started for Bollywood films. Recently released Kapil Sharma’s Zwigato flopped at the box office. After this, on March 24, the film crowd directed by Anubhav Sinha hit the theaters. The Raj Kumar Rao and Bhumi Pednekar starrer got a poor start on the first day itself. The film had to be content with earning only 15 lakhs on the opening day. Now let us know whether the film got any benefit of the weekend or not. Along with this, we are also talking about those reasons, due to which even the audience is not able to get the film.

Big rush at the box office

During the Corona epidemic, people across the country faced lockdown. The mob narrates the story of migrant laborers who struggled to return home during the lockdown. The crowd was given good reviews from film critics to movie review publishing houses. Despite this, the audience did not turn to theaters to watch the film. Talking about the collection of Sunday i.e. the third day, the film earned only Rs 70 lakhs. Overall the crowd collection has reached 1.50 crores in three days.

mob movie starcast

The film failed to attract people in the theaters on the very first day itself. There was definitely a slight increase in its collection on the second day. The mob did a business of Rs 65 lakh on Saturday. However, its earnings have still been well below expectations. Talking about the starcast, the Anubhav Sinha directed film also includes Rajkummar Rao, Bhumi Pednekar, Ashutosh Rana, Pankaj Kapur, Dia Mirza, Kritika Kamra and few others.

Why the film did not get the crowd

Actually, it is also necessary to talk about those reasons, due to which people did not find the film interesting. As a viewer, the story of the film felt somewhat incomplete. Not that the film doesn’t poke fun at some serious subjects. But it can be said that Anubhav Sinha is seen wandering somewhere for the purpose of showing the film. The film ends without any resolution. Perhaps the makers wanted to show that there is no permanent solution to any problem. However, if there was a little more clarity in the film, then people would have been a little more comfortable in understanding it.

Leave a Comment