PSC: PSC irregularities, ban on appointments, government said – will submit report to High Court after investigation

[ad_1]

Bilaspur. The state government has replied in the High Court regarding irregularities in PSC selection. It has been said that the government will investigate the matter itself and present a complete report and reply before the High Court. Also, till the next hearing of the case, by not promoting this issue, the persons who have been accused and have not been appointed, will not be finalized further. Along with this, those who have been appointed will be subject to the orders of the court, as the case may be. Taking this statement of the government on record, the High Court filed a petition. The next hearing is scheduled after a week.

The High Court has directed the State Government and the PSC to also investigate the authenticity of the facts in the list presented by the petitioner. Apart from this, the petitioner has been directed to make the selected persons parties and present the prescribed amendments in his petition. The petitioner has also been warned by the court that if the information given by the petitioner is found to be wrong, then appropriate action will be taken against him. A hearing was held in the High Court on Wednesday regarding recruitment in CGPSC.

Questions have been raised on their selection

PSC had released the final selection list on the morning of 12 May 2023. Questions are being raised since then. The names in the top 20 of the list were senior officials and businessmen.

Or are relatives of Congress leaders.

» Nitesh, Deputy Collector, adopted son of PSC Chairman Taman Singh Sonwani, surname hidden

» Sahil, DSP, son of elder brother of PSC Chairman Taman Singh Sonwani, surname hidden

» Nisha Koshale, Deputy Collector, wife of Nitesh, son of PSC Chairman Taman Singh.

» Deepa Ajgale / Adil District Excise Officer, daughter-in-law of brother of PSC Chairman Taman Singh Sonwani.

» Sunita Joshi, labor officer, daughter of PSC Chairman Taman Singh Sonwani’s sister.

» Sumit Dhruv, Deputy Collector, son of Amrit Khalkho, Secretary, Public Service Commission

» Nikhil Khalkho, Deputy Collector, son of Amrit Khalkho, Secretary, Public Service Commission.

» Sakshi Dhruv, Deputy Collector, daughter of DIG Dhruv of Bastar Naxal Operation.

» Pragya Nayak, Deputy Collector, daughter of Congress leader’s OSD relative

» Prakhar Nayak, Deputy Collector, son of Congress leader’s OSD relative

» Anya Agarwal, Deputy Collector, daughter of senior Congress leader

» Shashank Goyal, Deputy Collector, son-in-law of senior Congress leader Sudhir Katiyar

» Bhumika Katiyar, Deputy Collector, daughter of senior Congress leader Sudhir Katiyar

» Khushboo Bijora, Deputy Collector, daughter of Congress leader’s OSD’s brother-in-law

» Swarnim Shukla, Assistant Director, son of Congress leader Rajendra Shukla

» Rajendra Kumar Kaushik, Deputy Collector, son of senior Congress leader

» Minikshi Ganveer, daughter of Deputy Collector, Ganveer, who lives with Public Service Commission Chairman Taman Singh Sonwani.

Questions on selection of relatives of leaders

In his petition, MLA Nankiram Kanwar has raised questions on the selection of Raj Bhavan Secretary Amrit Khalko’s son and daughter as Deputy Collector as well as several Gallup relatives of PSC Chairman Taman Singh Sonwani as well as relatives of many leaders. The High Court has also expressed surprise after hearing the petitioner’s views. According to the Chief Justice, it is natural for children of officers to be selected in other institutions including PSC, but what is the coincidence that close relatives of the PSC Chairman have been selected. This is very wrong. The court said that their appointment should be stopped. The Division Bench has also directed to investigate the appointments to 18 posts of Chairman, officers and people close to the leaders of the ruling party.

Selected contestants also filed intervention petition

During the hearing on Wednesday, the selected contestants filed an intervention petition. It was said that five appointments have already been made, hence the ban is not justified. The court has said that except his appointment, there will be a ban on the appointment of the rest of the list. During the hearing, this fact also came to light that Nitesh Singh, who was said to be the son of PSC Chairman Taman Singh, is the son of former Sarpanch Rajesh. On this the Chief Justice expressed displeasure at the petitioner’s lawyer. Similarly, an intervention application has also been submitted on behalf of Pragya Nayak. In the case, the government lawyer on behalf of the government asked for time and told the court that the state government is looking into the matter. The appointment is also being investigated. Right now the Advocate General is out. After his arrival, a detailed answer to this entire matter will be presented. The state government has said that it will investigate the matter itself and present its reply before the court.

Conspiracy of officials:Raman

Former Chief Minister Dr. Raman Singh said, the Congress government has failed in the PSC transparent process. It is a matter of the future of lakhs of youth of Chhattisgarh. Today the court clearly expressed its displeasure. The government did not spare even the PSC in corruption. Money to money transactions were done. There was a conspiracy by the officials. It is surprising that many relatives of the PSC Chairman are selected for the post of Deputy Collector, DSP.

Will work on court orders: Bhupesh

Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel said, BJP leader Nanki Ram Kanwar has gone to court. We are following the orders of the court. He said, PSC recruitment was done in 2003 during his regime. In 2016, a decision was taken that there were irregularities in the merit list, till now its decision is awaited. If the court orders an investigation, we will get the investigation done. The court should direct us and we will work on it.

[ad_2]