Judicial custody of former Delhi Deputy CM Manish Sisodia extended.
Judicial custody of former Delhi Deputy CM Manish Sisodia extended.
Former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia’s difficulties are not taking the name of abatement. Today he was presented in Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court. Even today Manish Sisodia did not get relief from the court. His judicial custody has been extended till June 1. During this, Sisodia had demanded from the court that he should be given a chair, table and books. His demand has been accepted.
Sisodia said – PM Modi has arrogance
While leaving Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court premises, when the media questioned about the administrative rights of Delhi, he said that PM Narendra Modi has become very arrogant, he does not even believe in democracy and constitution. According to media reports, in the case of Delhi Liquor Scam, the ED produced Manish Sisodia in the court on Tuesday after the judicial custody was over, from where the period of his judicial custody was extended without giving him any relief. and extended.
Police was seen taking him by the neck
Manish Sisodia was taken for production at Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court. During this, the Delhi Police (Delhi) was seen taking Sisodia by the neck. A video of this is becoming increasingly viral on social media, to which Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal has reacted strongly. Sharing a clip from his Twitter handle, CM Kejriwal asked if the police had the right to misbehave with Manish Sisodia like this. Has anyone given instructions to the police to do this? At the same time, AAP minister Atishi Marlena said that Manish Sisodia has been misbehaved with shockingly by this policeman in Rouse Avenue Court. This policeman should be suspended immediately.
Also Read: Send to jail or hang, the caravan will not stop’, read Sisodia’s new letter
Police reacted to this video
Delhi Police has issued a statement on the video of Manish Sisodia being grabbed by the neck, saying that it is being propagated. The response of the police was necessary from the point of view of security. Also, said that making statements during judicial custody is illegal.
