Content removed from Chat GPT will not be valid US judge orders lawyers.
Content removed from Chat GPT will not be valid US judge orders lawyers.
Chat GPT News: Chat GPT has been mired in controversies since its inception. Questions have been raised about its functioning. Where on one hand some people consider it beneficial, on the other hand some people also oppose it and count its side effects. Now one such case has come to the fore from America. Where a federal judge has categorically told lawyers that he will not allow AI-generated content in his court.
As TechCrunch reports, Texas federal judge Brantley Starr said that any attorney appearing in his court must certify that “no part of the filing was prepared by generative artificial intelligence, or if it did.” it has been checked “by a human being”. All advocates appearing before the court shall have to enter a certificate on the docket.” If they were generated by an AI (such as ChatGPT, Harvey.AI, or Google Bard), it must be verified as accurate by a human or by a legal database.
According to the judge, these AI platforms are incredibly powerful and have many uses in law. Like divorce, discovery requests, suggested errors in documents, anticipated questions on oral arguments etc. But legal briefing is not one of them. It is because these platforms are prone to hallucinations and prejudices. On hallucinations they generate things even quotes.
Attorney representing a man suing an airline, Steven A. Schwartz acknowledged in an affidavit that he used OpenAI’s chatbot for his research. In considering sanctions for the plaintiffs’ attorneys, the judge scheduled a hearing in which the quotes from the AI and judicial decisions were falsified. U.S. District Judge Kevin Casteel confirmed that six of the presented cases appear to be bogus judicial decisions after opposing counsel pointed out the non-existent cases.”
Last month ChatGPT wrongly named an innocent and highly respected law professor in the US in a list of legal scholars as part of a research study. He was shown guilty of sexually assaulting students. Jonathan Turley, the Shapiro Chair of Public Interest Law at George Washington University, was shocked when he learned that ChatGPT had nominated him as part of a research project on legal scholars. In this, he was accused of sexually harassing someone. Turley put this matter in front of everyone by posting in a tweet. He said that “ChatGPT has recently released a false story accusing me of sexually harassing students.”
Also Read: This mid range smartphone of Vivo will be launched in India, know what will be the features
